Page 28 of 28

Re: Unofficial Deluge 2.0.x for Windows installer

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:02 pm
by ambipro
mutageni wrote: Sun Mar 31, 2024 1:14 pm Hello mhertz: Thank you for responding. I am using Qbittorrent version 4.3.9 which uses the same libtorrent 1.2.14 version. I actually wanted to check the performance of Deluge and Qbitorrent head to head. No worries if it is abnadoned. After testing all the available torrent clients for windows, I sort of settled at Qbittorrent which showed a best performance on the public torrents that I download. I was optimizing the Deluge 2.1.1 version using the built in libtorrent 1.2.15.0. This is my itconfig specifications. Any suggestions for optimizing the settings. I use Win 11, 8GB RAM, downloading into SSD (2TB) and using airvpn wireguard with port forwarding. The discussions in the Deliuge forum are very uyseful, thanks to you and other folks who are adding lot of knowledge to others.
I'll just post mine, and you can make a diff or something to compare. I download to a NVMe SSD, and haven't seen any bottlenecks except my actual internet connection.

If you have questions, let me know.

Code: Select all

{
    "file": 1,
    "format": 1
}{
    "apply_on_start": true,
    "settings": {
        "active_tracker_limit": 20000,
        "aio_threads": 10,
        "allow_multiple_connections_per_ip": true,
        "allowed_fast_set_size": 5,
        "announce_to_all_tiers": false,
        "announce_to_all_trackers": false,
        "apply_ip_filter_to_trackers": false,
        "broadcast_lsd": false,
        "checking_mem_usage": 2048,
        "choking_algorithm": 0,
        "coalesce_reads": true,
        "coalesce_writes": true,
        "file_pool_size": 2000,
        "listen_queue_size": 3000,
        "low_prio_disk": false,
        "max_failcount": 1,
        "max_out_request_queue": 2250,
        "max_peer_recv_buffer_size": 5242880,
        "max_queued_disk_bytes": 7340032,
        "max_rejects": 10,
        "mixed_mode_algorithm": 0,
        "no_atime_storage": true,
        "peer_timeout": 20,
        "peer_turnover": 0,
        "rate_limit_utp": false,
        "read_cache_line_size": 32,
        "request_timeout": 10,
        "send_buffer_low_watermark": 1048576,
        "send_buffer_watermark": 3145728,
        "send_buffer_watermark_factor": 150,
        "send_not_sent_low_watermark": 524288,
        "suggest_mode": 1,
        "support_share_mode": true,
        "tracker_receive_timeout": 20,
        "unchoke_slots_limit": -1,
        "use_read_cache": true,
        "use_write_cache": false,
        "validate_https_trackers": false,
        "write_cache_line_size": 256
    }
}

Re: Unofficial Deluge 2.0.x for Windows installer

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 7:00 pm
by mutageni
Tahnks a lot dear Ambipro for posting your settings. I am happy to report that I was able to achieve a download speed of 280 Mbps using airvpn wireguard connection. My actual speed without the vpn is 310 Mbps, so I am maxing out my speed. I am using Windows version of Deluge client 2.1.1 with the libtorrent version of 1.12.15.0. However, I am seeing that people were using 2.1.1 with libtorrent versions of 1.12.9 or 2.0.9 0r 2.0.10. Is there any advantage in the performance of using the recent libtorrent versions.

Thanks a lot again.




ambipro wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:02 pm
mutageni wrote: Sun Mar 31, 2024 1:14 pm Hello mhertz: Thank you for responding. I am using Qbittorrent version 4.3.9 which uses the same libtorrent 1.2.14 version. I actually wanted to check the performance of Deluge and Qbitorrent head to head. No worries if it is abnadoned. After testing all the available torrent clients for windows, I sort of settled at Qbittorrent which showed a best performance on the public torrents that I download. I was optimizing the Deluge 2.1.1 version using the built in libtorrent 1.2.15.0. This is my itconfig specifications. Any suggestions for optimizing the settings. I use Win 11, 8GB RAM, downloading into SSD (2TB) and using airvpn wireguard with port forwarding. The discussions in the Deliuge forum are very uyseful, thanks to you and other folks who are adding lot of knowledge to others.
I'll just post mine, and you can make a diff or something to compare. I download to a NVMe SSD, and haven't seen any bottlenecks except my actual internet connection.

If you have questions, let me know.

Code: Select all

{
    "file": 1,
    "format": 1
}{
    "apply_on_start": true,
    "settings": {
        "active_tracker_limit": 20000,
        "aio_threads": 10,
        "allow_multiple_connections_per_ip": true,
        "allowed_fast_set_size": 5,
        "announce_to_all_tiers": false,
        "announce_to_all_trackers": false,
        "apply_ip_filter_to_trackers": false,
        "broadcast_lsd": false,
        "checking_mem_usage": 2048,
        "choking_algorithm": 0,
        "coalesce_reads": true,
        "coalesce_writes": true,
        "file_pool_size": 2000,
        "listen_queue_size": 3000,
        "low_prio_disk": false,
        "max_failcount": 1,
        "max_out_request_queue": 2250,
        "max_peer_recv_buffer_size": 5242880,
        "max_queued_disk_bytes": 7340032,
        "max_rejects": 10,
        "mixed_mode_algorithm": 0,
        "no_atime_storage": true,
        "peer_timeout": 20,
        "peer_turnover": 0,
        "rate_limit_utp": false,
        "read_cache_line_size": 32,
        "request_timeout": 10,
        "send_buffer_low_watermark": 1048576,
        "send_buffer_watermark": 3145728,
        "send_buffer_watermark_factor": 150,
        "send_not_sent_low_watermark": 524288,
        "suggest_mode": 1,
        "support_share_mode": true,
        "tracker_receive_timeout": 20,
        "unchoke_slots_limit": -1,
        "use_read_cache": true,
        "use_write_cache": false,
        "validate_https_trackers": false,
        "write_cache_line_size": 256
    }
}

Re: Unofficial Deluge 2.0.x for Windows installer

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 7:06 pm
by ambipro
because of libtorrent 2's memory mapped files i recommend 1.2.19 or a variant of 1.2 near that. thats just my opinion though.

you can see our discussions all around the forum in regards to 2.x