File Priority

Suggestions and discussion of future versions
Post Reply
loki
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 787
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:27 pm
Location: MI, USA

File Priority

Post by loki »

I think it might be better to have priority listing as do not download, low priority, normal, and high. Instead of do not download, normal, high, and highest.
It's not too important, just makes more sense to me to include a low rather than 2 highs.
andar
Top Bloke
Top Bloke
Posts: 1050
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:38 pm
Location: Victoria, BC
Contact:

Re: File Priority

Post by andar »

loki wrote:I think it might be better to have priority listing as do not download, low priority, normal, and high. Instead of do not download, normal, high, and highest.
It's not too important, just makes more sense to me to include a low rather than 2 highs.
I guess the reasoning for how it is, is that libtorrent has 0 for 'not download' and 1 for normal.. the higher numbers mean higher priority.

I don't think there is any reason to change this.. It's purely cosmetic.
Frosty
Member
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:28 am

Re: File Priority

Post by Frosty »

I'm agree with andar, no need to change this. Highest priority is really usefull. For example: I'm downloading some serial, i've watched first 10 episodes, my brother not. I set high priority for 1-10 episodes and highest for 11-13 to watch them while first 10 is going down to my HDD for my brother, and only then all 14-xxx episodes will be downloaded. May be example is bad, but.... Highest priority is useful and there is no actual reason to remove it.
Post Reply