Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
SO... I am trying to use Deluge as a seedbox. I already have 600+ torrents added to it. I had to reboot, so after reboot I started Deluge again. For about 5 minutes deluged.exe was eating 25% of CPU and growing in terms of RAM up to 4 Gbs. Then it slowed down and memory used is now ~1,5 Gbs. But, now deluge.exe is eating 25% of CPU for over 30 minutes and it have not loaded ANY torrents whatsoever and in fact is not reacting to any commands. Using deluge-console.exe info does not result in anything, too - seems like it also hangs. Is that normal?..
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
I would say no...
I'm running deluge with about 580 torrents and deluged.exe footprint is only around 75 mb and deluge at about the same. Definitely something wrong.
I'm running deluge with about 580 torrents and deluged.exe footprint is only around 75 mb and deluge at about the same. Definitely something wrong.
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
I wonder what exactly is wrong... They all were in stopped state... But should it not make it load faster?.. Although they were not only in stopped state, but unchecked as well...laharah wrote:I would say no...
I'm running deluge with about 580 torrents and deluged.exe footprint is only around 75 mb and deluge at about the same. Definitely something wrong.
How long does it take to start it up for you, if starting it up from scratch? Like Starting the client, starting the daemon...
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
I'm running both on my local machine, so I don't have to worry about latency, but from pressing the icon until full responsiveness and all torrents loaded, about 4 seconds.How long does it take to start it up for you, if starting it up from scratch? Like Starting the client, starting the daemon...
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
I have an idea, what may be the issue (although, not likely): y torrent files were created with md5 hashes integrated. I will try to recreate them without it and see if that will help. Also, the total size of all torrents (not the .torrent files) is at least 1 Terrabyte, so that also may be the issue.
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
it's possible, though mine is about 1.25 TB in total as well.Simbiat wrote: Also, the total size of all torrents (not the .torrent files) is at least 1 Terrabyte, so that also may be the issue.
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
What version of libtorrent and deluge...
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
deluge 1.3.6.Cas wrote:What version of libtorrent and deluge...
libtorrent 0.15.10.0
And no, I am not using the classic mode (I saw the bug report about it). And all plugins are disabled and all settings are the same (except all added torrents are added in stopped state)
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
Ok you might be better using the 0.16 libtorrent version: http://download.deluge-torrent.org/windows/py2.7/
Re: Start Deluge with 600+ torrents in it
well, it uses less RAM now: ~100 Mbs for deluge.exe and ~900 Mbs for deluged.exe, but same thing... I'll keep it running for some time, though, just in caseCas wrote:Ok you might be better using the 0.16 libtorrent version: http://download.deluge-torrent.org/windows/py2.7/
BTW, total size of the .torrent files themselves (632 of them) is 150 Mbs.
This IS a volume issue: I tried leaving 500 torrents only. It still hangs, but at least now I can see the tree panel on the left ("States" and "Trackers") and it also show the number of torrents, although it shows 499 instead of 500...
The maximum number of torrents it seems to work with for me is 200, although it still shows 199... It took ~5 minutes to load them. Gonna try to get debug logs for you for my initial number of torrents, for 200 and for some lower number (like 50, maybe).
Debugs for 50 and 200 torrents does not have anything strange at all. At least nothing proving a performance issue. And I am unable to re-test issue with 600+ torrents: backed up state folder is no ignored by the client =( And i am unable to re-add them in bulk now =(