i've recompiled everything i could think of - without success. an overall update included deluge (1.1.5) and now it's working again. i don't know why - doesn't really matter...

this is a gentoo box. all dependencies should have been met during compile - i dont get this. i will try to reinstall python - maybe this will take care of the bindings as well...

hi everybody. after the upgrade to 1.1.4 i was unable to start deluge - the gui does not load all i get is kind of an empty window. i think the gui is waiting for the daemon to start - but "deluge -d" gives me: endeavor / # deluged -d [ERROR ] 22:28:50 main:207 No module named libtorrent T...

hello, i just had an issue that was kind of strange. i ran out of diskspace during download - the torrents in question displayed "connection timeout" and were mared red (error). i deleted some files but the torrents were unable to resume - i had to restart the gui and daemon. not much of a...

just for clarity: you want to select a file inside a of file? so you have an archive like many-books.daa and need something inside that file? i dont think that deluge could do that. it might be possible to to extract a file from an incomplete daa file if the header is already downloaded and the part...

look at that: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.networ ... rrent/1826

it seems that you are not alone. maybe you should try a different version of libtorrent and see what happens.

I usually use 'Remove and delete torrent file' feature. I dont really know a way to clear the torrent list circumventing that button. But ok, I cleared the folder and keep an eye on it.

I just looked through ~/.config/deluge/torrentfiles/ and found that there are 1914 torrent files totaling 41.1mb. There is every file I ever downloaded with that particular installation of deluge. Most of these files are flexrss-remnants. I saw that before: my /tmp folder had these huge amounts of f...

it seems to be issue of faith. Not facts. ;( I'll give you that one. Yesterday night I put ext3 to the test and ran defrag (shake) on my files and the effect is clear. There is a performance gain and it's obvious without having to benchmark it. Things go much smoother and faster _overall_ . To be h...

ok THAT is crappy.

and something should be done about it... it seems like the choice between compact and full allocation is merely a choice between instantanious space reservation and and an incremental one.