It's not a plugin, but it can do what you are describing and much more...

https://github.com/jerrymakesjelly/autoremove-torrents

I use it on a scheduled cron, and it works for me.

Your web instance is not connected to the RPC/deluge daemon. It is not "accepting" anything. It has no daemon to speak to...this is something we've seen before.

I don't have any personal experience with deluge-console. Sorry. @mhertz will be able to comment on that I'd expect.

This is an interesting thought, and I'm not entirely sure what, if any, consequences may come from this, as I'm not fully sure of the extent in which this is a necessary piece of the puzzle in some other aspect of Deluge or libtorrent. My first thought is that there _COULD_ be some reason that this ...

As an additional note, you have to edit the connection, you can't just use the prompt that happens when you connect.

You probably need to click on connection manager and connect it to the RPC daemon.

I'll PM you something that might help.

You are telling me that you think that Nord does not support port forwarding, but that your SOCKS5 circumvents their policy entirely? The RFC supports a very convoluted and historically unimplemented method for accepting connections, yes. I have yet to see any clients or SOCKS5 daemons implement thi...

(Also, as an aside, I use SOCKS on a private tracker and generally have no issues seeding over it) To each their own. With socks, you will be "seeding" only when you connect to peers. This generally happens when you are actively downloading and have pieces those peers do not, and thus you...

https://www.google.com/search?q=split+tunnelling+wireguard+windows I see plenty of options. Do some digging. While SOCKS might protect you from blatantly screaming your address, it is hardly secure relative to a _REAL_ VPN protocol like Wireguard. You also will not be able to seed anything, as I pre...

Edit2: If you right click and then regular click the Name spot - it will select it. This is a bug that @mhertz had addressed in ltConfig selecting for checkboxes. I'm not sure how, but perhaps not a big issue that can be fixed. Cheers for the debugging. @mhertz, can you recall the potentially relat...