Sorry haven't tested this, but is it same with the libtorrent 1.2.x libtorrent version of deluge. I don't remember any changes to deluge itself regarding this, though not as observant as before though grantedly.

Thanks for your post and contribution :) Anyway, just wanted post to say that with exception of last one, then rest 2 example commands from Cas indeed does work, so just a heads up for others, e.g. finding this thread in there searches etc. Just that... It can be tricky to deal with escaping with co...

Need make a pull request on the deluge github repo for official review and merging, leading to inclusion in later release. Unofficially you can upload anywhere and post link about it here, for people to apply locally. Hmm sorry, just googled it and the deluge contribution guide for translations, sim...

Not selectively per torrent no, sorry. Unzip latest egg file, for latest source, as not changed anything in between. Well hmm, only thing missed from the egg unzipping method, is the setup.py file, and you mention wanting develop further, so I will upload the full source later, when get to it, e.g n...

Maybe if having selected in ltconfig 'default' preset earlier at some point, which uses hard-coded values unfortunately, and things become outdated, e.g here rate_limit_utp, becoming default on libtorrent 1.2 and up, though now deprecated, but hence why deluge removed it's own option for it. Persona...

The 'auth' file in local profile folder needs be in '/var/lib/deluged/config'. The other errors(except gtk one, which probably related to the others) I posted command-lines and/or fixed files for previously, and will edit in a link here later. Edit: Delete line 111 and 142 of deluge/i18n/util.py to ...

Please don't post haphazardly like that, cross posting and necro-bumping, thanks - Matter of respect imho, not only to me/us, but the board. Anyway, yes you need an older client as you infer I.e v2.0.x, or upgrade the server to current supported version. Google how getting older version for your OS,...

As you said, it's fine, and just needs looking into how to overcome this annoyance(false-positives) for feature.

Appreciate your diligence and post though, to hopefully calm others down also - thanks buddy.

The official docs for rpc api, has in latest versions on readthedocs site an issue where lists only the actual rpc implementation under the rpc api section, instead of the user-friendly rpc api, like as under the web api section. So need check under an older working version i.e. 2.0.5 here: https://...