Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
-
- Compulsive Poster
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:27 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL, USA
- Contact:
Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
yes, i pulled the plugs. even though many thousands actually used the service, only a very, very, *very* few supported us with the ads. to those who did, i thank you very much i'm sorry i couldnt afford to keep it up.
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
I have a question, how soon are you going to release next version of Deluge? Just asking, because some of users are going to report me bugs.. I am wondering if I should wait for next version or add patch to disable it complete in ports/package. Thanks for being creative and give it a shot.
-
- Compulsive Poster
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:27 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL, USA
- Contact:
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
probably a week's time. sorry for the troublemezz wrote:I have a question, how soon are you going to release next version of Deluge? Just asking, because some of users are going to report me bugs.. I am wondering if I should wait for next version or add patch to disable it complete in ports/package. Thanks for being creative and give it a shot.
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
It's not a big deal for me, so no worry. I have committed a patch to display a message box when users click on browser button instead of actually browser window for now until next release.markybob wrote:probably a week's time. sorry for the trouble
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/p ... le_browser
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
Instead of just removing a plugin, why not just enhance it a bit? The idea is good, so why not still allow a Proxy, and allow a user to configure there own Web Proxy rather than the one being provided. Deluge already has a setting for Web Proxies, can't we tie that into the Browser?
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
you can do that now using about:config same as firefox.
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
sorry to hear that, are you much out of pocket?markybob wrote:yes, i pulled the plugs. even though many thousands actually used the service, only a very, very, *very* few supported us with the ads. to those who did, i thank you very much i'm sorry i couldnt afford to keep it up.
-
- Compulsive Poster
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:27 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL, USA
- Contact:
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
should've checked my math before posting...in the hole around $1000 that's life sometimes, i guess.johnnyg wrote:sorry to hear that, are you much out of pocket?markybob wrote:yes, i pulled the plugs. even though many thousands actually used the service, only a very, very, *very* few supported us with the ads. to those who did, i thank you very much i'm sorry i couldnt afford to keep it up.
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
yeah I guess it is, still a bummer though.markybob wrote:should've checked my math before posting...in the hole around $1000 that's life sometimes, i guess.johnnyg wrote:sorry to hear that, are you much out of pocket?markybob wrote:yes, i pulled the plugs. even though many thousands actually used the service, only a very, very, *very* few supported us with the ads. to those who did, i thank you very much i'm sorry i couldnt afford to keep it up.
is it still possible to generate ad-based revenue even though the service is no longer available?
it doesn't seem fair that you should have to pay (literally) for what seemed like a good idea (my only complaint with it was that you couldn't use your existing browser)
-
- Compulsive Poster
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:27 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL, USA
- Contact:
Re: Proxy Server "Anonymizing Browser" Down
thanks. we still get ad revenue from our website, which is anywhere between $5-9 a day. so eventually, i'll get it back it'll just take a long time. also, i cant say if someone is gonna donate or how much they'll donate, so i guess i'll just have to wait and see how things go. hopefully deluge will get more popular and we'll get more traffic, etc.johnnyg wrote:yeah I guess it is, still a bummer though.
is it still possible to generate ad-based revenue even though the service is no longer available?
it doesn't seem fair that you should have to pay (literally) for what seemed like a good idea (my only complaint with it was that you couldn't use your existing browser)